Equality of outcome feminism

The majority of this research was conducted by historian and citizen blogger Prentice Reid. As early asthe president of one chapter of the National Organization for Women, the largest feminist organization in the US, complained about the unfairness of equality when it meant giving up a traditional female privilege.

Equality of outcome

Infeminists refused to even sit at the table with men to discuss men and women sharing, equally, the responsibilities and decisions involved in parenting. What is the rationale behind opposing equality? Men suck. How do men suck? Let us count the ways. Surely, in the case of abusive or negligent fathers, that is likely true.

It is also true of abusive or negligent mothers. Feminists insist all fathers should be denied the right to equality because some fathers might be abusive or negligent, while completely ignoring the fact that most violence against children is carried out by women. Children without fathers in their lives suffer in measurable, meaningful ways, but feminists fight tooth and nail to keep Daddy on the margins. InNOW upped the ante, and declared that fathers who want a relationship with their children after divorce are really only interested in controlling the woman.

A gift that hurts men, hurts children, and ultimately hurts the women feminists purport to be protecting as damaged children struggle to find their path in life without their Dads. They care about their jobs. Being a feminist is profitable. Which is why NOW came out against mediated custody settlements, too.

Know why? Joint custody is the most common outcome of mediated custody settlements. The next time some irate feminist points to the dictionary and accuses you of not understanding what feminism even means, ask her why, if feminists believe so fervently in equality, they oppose equal parenting? How will women ever be equal outside the home if men are not equal within in? Yeah, that probably makes you a feminist. Sign up for the Thought Catalog Weekly and get the best stories from the week to your inbox every Friday.

You may unsubscribe at any time.

If Women Ruled The World

By subscribing, you agree to the terms of our Privacy Statement. Narcissist much? Feminists make everything about themselves. That hits feminists where it hurts. In the wallet. If you oppose shared parenting, you oppose equality. More From Thought Catalog. Get our newsletter every Friday!

You're in! Follow Thought Catalog.By Emily Jacobs. November 2, am Updated November 2, pm. A video made and shared by Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris is causing a stir on Twitter — for arguing in favor of the Communist principle of equality of outcome. Both men are given the same length rope; the problem, however, is that the white man is standing by the end of his rope while the black man is at the bottom of a cliff and unable to reach his rope.

Harris has taken some heat in the hours since sharing the video, specifically from those arguing that while equal opportunity was inherently American, equal outcomes would be an example of communism by ensuring that each person gets the same result. A century of history has shown where that path leads. We all embrace equal opportunity, but government-enforced equality of outcomes is Marxism. Start out with a well-intentioned point on equality of opportunity, only to end it with the true Marxist intent: equity in outcomes.

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has worked tirelessly during this general election season to distance himself from concerns about the far-left wing of his party, especially after trouncing former primary rival Sen.

Bernie Sanders I-Vt. Read Next. Farmer denies running over jogger mom, then raping and kil This story has been shared 84, times. This story has been shared 80, times.

This story has been shared 78, times. View author archive email the author follow on twitter Get author RSS feed. Name required. Email required. Comment required. More On: kamala harris. Kamala Harris target of more misinformation than Mike Pence, data shows. Read Next Farmer denies running over jogger mom, then raping and kil Share Selection.

You can get Coach Outlet's surprise Valentine's Day collection for up to 65 percent off. Where to buy Bernie Sanders' mittens from viral inauguration memes. Now On Now on Page Six.

Video length 46 seconds Find out the jobs behind these expensive clothes. More Stories. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.June 6, Lately I've increasingly encountered arguments for "equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome", which is usually shorthand for a bunch of nastier opinions held by people who don't think we should be aiming for a more inclusive society.

As far as I can tell, this is largely due to the rising popularity of Jordan Petersen, a conservative pseudointellectual who is fast becoming the voice of unreconstructed dudes who like to complain about feminism. A good example of a distinction made between the two goes as follows :. Equality of opportunity provides in a sense that all start the race of life at the same time. Equality of outcome attempts to ensure that everyone finishes at the same time. Everyone must be completely equal!

That means we must suppress achievement! We must make everybody the same! Of course, nobody wants that at all.

Blinn 2021

It's a disingenuous argument designed to avoid talking about systemic inequalities, and to thwart efforts to correct the balance. In this fictitious world, for example, highly-qualified male software engineers are being overlooked in favor of less-qualified women engineers.

equality of outcome feminism

And by using diversity and inclusion metrics to measure progress, we're erroneously baking in discrimination against highly-qualified straight, white men. At best, it's a half-understanding of reality. At worst, it's a deliberate subversion of reality in order to maintain the status quo.

The reality is that women and people from underrepresented backgrounds are being discriminated against. Sometimes this is overt and intentional: open racism and sexism exist in depressingly large numbers.

Beyond that, it's got a lot to do with who has traditionally had power and privilege. In venture capital, it's considered bad form to reach out to an investor cold a practice that I believe needs to change - please do pitch me cold!

Who is going to do better from those systems: people whose ancestors were sold into slavery, who suffered racial oppression, who were persecuted for political reasons, who fled their countries, who hid aspects of their identities in order to survive - or people whose communities have enjoyed relative privilege for generations?

But white male privilege is a myth. For example, we'll likely hear an argument that the 79 cents women earn for every dollar earned by me is a myth because " women choose different jobs ". Back in reality, the racial differential statistics are hard to argue with. And the idea of women choosing different sets of jobs - perhaps that they're biologically more suited for, if you want to throw in an extra layer of bigotry without, of course, interrogating why those jobs are less highly-valued - is not supported by research.

As Catherine Pearson notes in the Huffington Post:.

equality of outcome feminism

Sure, many women choose to stay home or cut back their hours after having children. And, culturally, Americans remain ambivalent about women working outside of the home. Fairly or not, I find myself thinking that many of the complaints come from people who are bitter that the attention isn't on them.

Maybe they feel like life is hard for them and it's unfairly portrayed as being easy.Equality of outcomeequality of conditionor equality of results is a controversial political concept. Achieving this requires reducing or eliminating material inequalities between individuals or households in a society. The concept is central to some political ideologies and is used regularly in political discourse, often in contrast to the term equality of opportunity.

A related way of defining equality of outcome is to think of it as "equality in the central and valuable things in life. Equality of outcome is often compared to related concepts of equality. Generally, the concept is most often contrasted with the concept of equality of opportunitybut there are other concepts as well. The term has been seen differently from differing political perspectives, but of all of the terms relating to equalityequality of outcome is the most "controversial" or "contentious".

After the Russian Revolution ofthe political structure of the Soviet Union — tried to emphasize equality of outcome as a primary goal. Photo: Vladimir Lenin addresses a crowd in Moscow in In political philosophythere are differing views whether equal outcomes are beneficial or not. One view is that there is a moral basis for equality of outcome, but that means to achieve such an outcome can be malevolent.

Equality of outcome can be a good thing after it has been achieved since it reflects the natural "interdependence of citizens in a highly organized economy" and provides a "basis for social policies" which foster harmony and good will, including social cohesion and reduced jealousy.

One writer suggested greater socioeconomic equality was "indispensable if we want to realise our shared commonsense values of societal fairness. An opposing view is that equality of outcomes is not beneficial overall for society since it dampens motivation necessary for humans to achieve great things, such as new inventions, intellectual discoveries, and artistic breakthroughs.

According to this view, wealth and income is a reward needed to spur such activity, and with this reward removed, then achievements which would benefit everybody may not happen. If equality of outcomes is seen as beneficial for society, and if people have differing levels of material wealth in the present, then methods to transform a society towards one with greater equality of outcomes is problematic.

A mainstream view is that mechanisms to achieve equal outcomes——to take a society and with unequal wealth and force it to equal outcomes——are fraught with moral as well as practical problems since they often involve force to compel the transfer. Economist Paul Krugman in And there is general agreement that outcomes matter. In one report in Britain, unequal outcomes in terms of personal wealth had a strong impact on average life expectancysuch that wealthier people tended to live seven years longer than poorer people, and that egalitarian nations tended to have fewer problems with societal issues such as mental illnessviolenceteenage pregnancyand other social problems.

Philosopher John Rawlsin his A Theory of Justicedeveloped a "second principle of justice" that economic and social inequalities can only be justified if they benefit the most disadvantaged members of society. Further, Rawls claims that all economically and socially privileged positions must be open to all people equally. Rawls argues that the inequality between a doctor's salary and a grocery clerk's is only acceptable if this is the only way to encourage the training of sufficient numbers of doctors, preventing an unacceptable decline in the availability of medical care which would therefore disadvantage everyone.

In a lamp assembly factory, for example, equality of outcome might mean that workers are all paid equally regardless of how many lamps they make.

This can be contrasted with a payment system such as piece workwhich requires that every worker is paid a fixed amount of money per lamp. The relationship between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome is an important controversial topic in politics and economics.

Both equality of outcome and equality of opportunity have been contrasted to a great extent.

Borlotti beans recipe italian

When evaluated in a simple context, the more preferred term in contemporary political discourse is equality of opportunity which the public, as well as individual commentators, see as the nicer or more "well-mannered" [14] of the two terms. A mainstream political view is that the comparison of the two terms is valid, but that they are somewhat mutually exclusive in the sense that striving for either type of equality would require sacrificing the other to an extent, and that achieving equality of opportunity necessarily brings about "certain inequalities of outcome.

The two concepts, however, are not always cleanly contrasted, since the notion of equality is complex. Some analysts see the two concepts not as polar opposites but as highly related such that they can not be understood without considering the other term. One writer suggested it was unrealistic to think about equality of opportunity in isolation, without considering inequalities of income and wealth. Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in In contemporary political discourse, of the two concepts, equality of outcome has sometimes been criticized as the "politics of envy" and is often seen as more "controversial" than equality of opportunity.

Critics of equality of opportunity note that while it is relatively easier to deal with unfairness for people with different races or genders, it is much harder to deal with social class since "one can never entirely extract people from their ancestry and upbringing.The feminist movement also known as the women's movementor simply feminism refers to a series of political campaigns for reforms on issues such as reproductive rightsdomestic violencematernity leaveequal paywomen's suffragesexual harassmentand sexual violence.

The movement's priorities vary among nations and communities, and range from opposition to female genital mutilation in one country, to opposition to the glass ceiling in another.

Feminism in parts of the Western world has gone through a series of waves. First-wave feminism was oriented around the station of middle- or upper-class white women and involved suffrage and political equality. Second-wave feminism attempted to further combat social and cultural inequalities.

Although the first wave of feminism involved mainly middle class white women, the second wave brought in women of color and women from other developing nations that were seeking solidarity.

equality of outcome feminism

In reaction to political activism, feminists have also had to maintain focus on women's reproductive rights, such as the right to abortion. Fourth-wave feminism examines the interlocking systems of power that contribute to the stratification of traditionally marginalized groups. Feminism in China started in the 20th century with the Chinese Revolution in In China, Feminism has a strong association with socialism and class issues.

Feminism in the United States, Canada and a number of countries in western Europe has been divided into three waves by feminist scholars: firstsecond and third-wave feminism. The women's movement became more popular in May when women began to read again, more widely, the book The Second Sexwritten in by a defender of women's rights, Simone de Beauvoir and translated into English for the first time in ; later translation De Beauvoir's writing explained why it was difficult for talented women to become successful.

The obstacles de Beauvoir enumerates include women's inability to make as much money as men do in the same profession, women's domestic responsibilities, society's lack of support towards talented women, and women's fear that success will lead to an annoyed husband or prevent them from even finding a husband at all. De Beauvoir also argues that women lack ambition because of how they are raised, noting that girls are told to follow the duties of their mothers, whereas boys are told to exceed the accomplishments of their fathers.

Through this movement, women gained equal rights such as a right to an education, a right to work, and a right to vote. One of the most important issues that The Women's Liberation movement faced was the banning of abortion and contraception, which the group saw as a violation of women's rights. Thus, they made a declaration known as Le Manifeste de which held signatures from women admitting to having had an illegal abortion.

The group gained support upon the publication. Women received the right to abort with the passing of the Veil Law in The Women's movement effected change in Western society, including women's suffragethe right to initiate divorce proceedings and "no fault" divorce, the right of women to make individual decisions regarding pregnancy including access to contraceptives and abortionand the right to own property. In Crystal Eastman wrote an article published in the Birth Control Review, she contended that birth control is a fundamental right for women and must be available as an alternative if they are to participate fully in the modern world.

The United Nations Human Development Report estimated that when both paid employment and unpaid household tasks are accounted for, on average women work more than men. The feminist movement's agenda includes acting as a counter to the putatively patriarchal strands in the dominant culture. While differing during the progression of waves, it is a movement that has sought to challenge the political structure, power holders, and cultural beliefs or practices. Although antecedents to feminism may be found far back before the 18th century, the seeds of the modern feminist movement were planted during the late part of that century.

Christine de Pizana late medieval writer, was possibly the earliest feminist in the western tradition. She is believed to be the first woman to make a living out of writing. Feminist thought began to take a more substantial shape during the Enlightenment with such thinkers as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and the Marquis de Condorcet championing women's education.

Journals for women that focused on issues like science became popular during this period as well. The women who made the first efforts towards women's suffrage came from more stable and privileged backgrounds, and were able to dedicate time and energy into making change.

Initial developments for women, therefore, mainly benefited white women in the middle and upper classes. Prior to the 20th century, women in China were considered [ by whom? In the patriarchal society, the struggle for women's emancipation means to enact laws that guarantee women's full equality of race, sex, property and freedom of marriage.

Equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome

In order to further eliminate the legacy of the class society of patriarchal women drowning of infants, corsetfootbindingetc. Before the westernization movement and the reform movement, women had set off a wave of their own strength in the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom — However, there are too many women from the bottom identities in the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom.

It is difficult to get rid of the fate of being used. Until the end of the Qing Dynasty, women with more knowledges took the initiative in the fight for women's rights and that is where feminism basically started. The term 'feminism' was first transmitted to China in which was proposed by Olympe de Gouges and promoted the 'women's liberation'.The people fighting for equality of opportunity or the people fighting for equality of outcome?

Or perhaps both are desirable? Since this is kind of a vague term. And while both have the word equality in common, equality of opportunity and equality of outcome are not the same thing. Which are two totally different things. Equality of opportunity is a state of fairness in which job applicants are treated similarly, unhampered by artificial barriers or prejudices, except when particular distinctions can be explicitly justified.

This fundamentally means that the goal of equality of opportunity is that all humans across the whole world get an equal amount of opportunities regardless of their race, social status and gender. For example, every person should get the chance to go to school and get an education, another example is that everyone should have the opportunity to get a job.

Everyone should also get the opportunity to get decent healthcare and so on. Equality of outcome is the state or quality of being equal correspondence in degree, ability, value, quantity or rank unhampered by artificial barriers or prejudices or preferences except when particular distinctions can be explicitly justified.

This means that equality of outcome strives for every person to be equally competent, valued and reimbursed as such.

Let me explain down below. Simply put, I think that equality of opportunity is always good and something we should strive for. But striving for equality of outcome is bad and not even something we should desire. We have already established, and this is well documented, that every individual is different in skills, values and believes.

This means that every individual has their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Because life in itself is unfair and not everyone is blessed with the same advantages. However, what we are equal in is the fact that we are all human beings. If we believe that every person is unique then that also means that each one of us has their own unique talents and personality traits which will in turn affect which goals we pursue, as we are all wired and talented in different ways.

equality of outcome feminism

I am all for every individual all over the world getting equal chances, uninhibited by prejudices and artificial barriers. This way, we are free to pursue whatever skills and passions we value and want to improve at. If we allow every individual to be the best possible version of their self then the world will be a better place because the people around us also benefit from every individual improving their unique skill set.

Be it because they are more skilled in their job or if they improve themselves personality wise leading to less spite, hate and violence in the world.If we look at the actual actions of leading feminist organizations, it's crystal clear that feminism is about preferential treatment of women, not equality.

Feminists have lobbied for and won policies advantaging females in education, in health care, in job hiring, in business ownership, in how domestic violence is handled and more. Feminists have actively tried to block equal rights for men such as equal joint custody. Of course, we also see feminist efforts spending a lot of energy disseminating propaganda aimed at advantaging females.

Anyone who says feminism these days is about equality is either not paying attention or purposely misrepresenting the true actions of feminism. I personally find it hard to believe anyone who has paid attention at all actually believes feminism is about equality. On the off chance that we take a gander at the real activities of driving women's activist associations, it's completely clear that woman's rights is about particular treatment of ladies, not equity.

Hira mani name meaning in urdu

Women's activists have campaigned for and won approaches advantaging females in schooling, in medical services, in occupation employing, in business possession, in how aggressive behavior at home is taken care of and the sky is the limit from there.

Women's activists have effectively attempted to impede equivalent rights for men, for example, equivalent joint guardianship. Obviously, we additionally see women's activist endeavors burning through a ton of effort dispersing promulgation pointed toward advantaging females. Any individual who says woman's rights these days is about uniformity is either not focusing or intentionally distorting the genuine activities of women's liberation.

I for one think that its difficult to accept any individual who has focused at all really accepts women's liberation is about balance. If you've never been treated as a woman is treated, you really have no grasp on their gender-based issues. If you've never been treated as a man is treated, you really have no grasp on their gender-based issues.

This is like the "fish has no concept of water" analogy. A fish has no idea of the huge and wonderful blessing water is to its way of life, just as a mouse has no idea of the huge and wonderful blessing air is to its way. You take a fish out of water, or you take a mouse out of air and to the degree that these animals can understand anythingyou get some level of enlightenment um, shortly before they die.

I don't think most women have a clue how much deference they are given in terms of comfort, liability, responsibility etc due to their gender. I don't think most men have a clue how much respect they get just with height and depth of voice. Very rarely do we get an intrepid explorer who gets to see life from the other's point of view, and they are inevitably surprised, and usually chastened.

Feminism is the radial notion that women who have full agency and equal rights to men in the west, are "oppressed". Isn't that sad?

Axe of pain 5e

Don't you think men should have known this without women having to pound it into their conscious. Just saying. The only policy feminists advocate for that approaches "preferential treatment for females" is 'affirmative action', which means to use disadvantaged group status as a tie breaker between two candidates of otherwise equal merit.


thoughts on “Equality of outcome feminism”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *